Secure owner login
Owners see only their own animals, documents and requests, and a password reset works without a call to the office.
A customer portal website for mobile veterinarians gives owners a secure login for visit notes, estimates, medication instructions and refill requests. SIZ Group builds it so the practice sees every open request on one screen, even while the vet is driving between stops.
Most of the paperwork in a house call practice moves by text and voicemail. An owner asks for last month's visit notes while the vet is in another driveway, a refill question arrives as a photo of a medication label, and an estimate for a senior dog's dental work is talked through on the phone. Each message is valid, but none of them sits in one place.
The breakdown happens at the handoff. The vet may answer a refill from the van, but the office has no way to know it was sent, so the owner receives two different answers. By the end of the week, the operations manager is rebuilding conversations from a phone and a mail app instead of working from a record.
The first release should cover secure owner login, a shared document area for visit notes and estimates, and one queue for refill and records requests. Those three pieces remove the most duplicated messages and give the operations manager one place to work from, which is the real problem to solve.
Online deposits, a full client account history and automated reminders can come later. They are worth building once the team trusts the queue and owners are using the login regularly.
Many mobile practices keep scheduling in a field service tool such as Jobber or Housecall Pro, while visit records sit in a veterinary system such as ezyVet or eVetPractice. The portal should read from whichever system holds each document, through an export, an API or a scheduled import, and we confirm the method during the scoping call.
Calendar apps may also hold the route, and the portal does not need to replace them. It needs one clear status for each request and a link to the right document, nothing more.
Owners see only their own animals, documents and requests, and a password reset works without a call to the office.
Visit notes, lab results and estimates appear as soon as staff release them, in a format the owner can download.
Refills, records and payment questions land in one list with a named owner and a reply target.
Owners approve or decline an estimate from a phone, and the decision is saved to the record with a time stamp.
Each request shows whether it was received, is with the vet or has been answered, so owners stop chasing by text.
The receptionist, the vet and the operations manager each see the requests and documents that match their job.
The practice needs to list the documents owners ask for most, such as visit notes, lab results and estimates, and the format each one is kept in. It also needs approved wording for consent and privacy, and a decision on which staff can see refill or payment requests.
On the technical side, we need the name of each system that holds records and invoices, with export or API access if it exists, plus domain and hosting access. Logos, brand colors and a named approver for medical wording complete the list.
Opening a login before anyone owns each request type causes the most trouble. A refill request in a shared inbox with no owner brings the owner back to the phone, and the portal has added work instead of removing it. Give each request type one owner and one reply target before launch.
The second is storing documents in an open folder because uploads are easier to manage that way. Veterinary records are not covered by HIPAA, yet they still deserve protection, so access should be limited by role, sessions should time out and staff should be able to see who opened each file.
The third is skipping the staff session. A van team in the middle of a route cannot learn a new queue in a rush, so training has to happen before launch, using real requests rather than a demo.
The main cost drivers are the number of document types, the number of request types and the number of systems the portal must read from. A portal with visit notes and refill requests costs less than one that also handles estimates, payments and a full account history. Each system connection adds testing and a maintenance step, so those decisions are made early.
We keep scope under control by agreeing the document list, the request types and the integrations during the scoping call, then confirming them in writing. Each new item after that is quoted separately, so the timeline is set against the agreed scope rather than a guess.
Where the system allows it, yes. The portal reads the documents it needs through an export, an API or a scheduled import. Where none of those is practical, staff upload the file when it is released, and we agree the method during the scoping call.
Yes. The login, document area and request form are built for phones first. An owner can check a visit note or approve an estimate without waiting for a callback from the office.
The practice does. Each request type has an owner, and the queue shows which items need a clinical answer. The portal never sends medical advice on its own, and the veterinarian approves any wording before it goes live.
Costs fall between $300 and $2,200. Login, document and integration choices decide where a portal lands in that band, and the practice receives the figure in writing once the scoping call is done.
A short session on the queue is usually enough for the front desk, with a separate one for the vet on approvals. We run it with real requests from the practice's own inbox, so the team learns the process it will actually use.
Tell us which documents owners ask for most and which systems hold them. We confirm scope and price in writing during the scoping call, then help the team after go-live. Email info@sizgroup.com.