Projects at risk
Jobs nearing a deadline without a finished proof are listed first, with the owner named beside each one.
A manager oversight app for translation agencies shows the operations director every open project, linguist availability and client deadline across all language pairs. SIZ Group builds it for iPhone and Android, so a director can reroute a rush Japanese job to an available translator from an airport lounge.
A translation agency may run dozens of projects across twenty language pairs, with some linguists working in only one direction and others covering three. A rush order for a clinical trial document can collide with a software release already in review. The operations director often learns about the clash when a client asks why a file is late.
Spreadsheets hold the answer, but only for a day. Each project manager keeps a private list, rates live in a separate workbook and linguist calendars sit with each freelancer. A managing view that reads those sources in one place lets the director move a job before the deadline passes.
Staffing decisions suffer the same blind spot. A linguist who is free on Tuesday may be booked on Thursday by a project nobody told the director about. Seeing bookings and free time side by side lets the director choose whether a rush job waits for a planned delivery or moves to someone with room.
Buyers of translation rarely shop on price alone. A compliance manager wants terminology from a regulated field handled correctly, a marketing lead wants speed and a consistent brand voice, and an immigration attorney needs certified work that a receiving office will accept. Most of those buyers judge the agency on the first proof they see and on whether status updates arrive when promised.
The oversight view is where those promises are protected. When the director can see which projects are at risk, which linguist has capacity and which client has a deadline that week, the agency keeps its word on the things buyers notice first.
A director who sees the next two weeks clearly can promise a delivery date with confidence, and that confidence is what clients remember after the invoice is paid.
Most translation agencies work in computer-assisted tools such as memoQ or Trados Studio, keep their accounting in QuickBooks or Xero and manage files in shared drives. The oversight app should not compete with those tools. It should read job status, deadlines and assigned linguists, then give the director one summary that none of those tools produces on its own.
Connections are worth discussing once the first release is stable. Some tools offer exports or APIs, and others need a daily file drop. We confirm the options for each tool during the scoping call rather than assuming a live link exists.
Jobs nearing a deadline without a finished proof are listed first, with the owner named beside each one.
See who is free for each language pair over the next two weeks, with specialist areas shown.
Move a rush job to a qualified linguist, and the change is logged together with the reason.
Each client's upcoming deliveries sit on one calendar, with rush and restricted work marked.
Confidential matters appear with their deadline and owner, while the documents stay behind access rules.
Reassignments, rate changes and escalations are recorded with the person and the time they happened.
Clinical, legal and government translation carries its own rules. Medical records may fall under HIPAA business associate terms, some client contracts restrict where files can be stored, and certain government work requires that only cleared linguists see the material. The director's view should show that a restricted project exists, along with its deadline and owner, without displaying the documents.
Each freelancer's access should match the contract they signed. Access should end when an assignment closes, and every change to a restricted job should be logged. Counsel should confirm the wording of each client agreement before the app holds any data from that client.
The agency should provide its language pairs, its roster of linguists with availability and specialist areas, and the standard stages of a typical project. It should also list clients with restricted terms and the people allowed to see each restricted job.
Deadlines and rush rules need a written source. Set out how much notice a rush surcharge requires, which clients hold priority and how a missed deadline is escalated, so the app applies the same rules every time.
The first mistake is building the view around the tool rather than the decision. A director does not need every field of every project. They need the jobs at risk, the linguists who can take them and the clients who will call. Start from those questions and remove any column that does not help answer one of them.
The second is letting the view become a performance file on each linguist. Rankings based on speed alone reward shallow work, and freelancers who see themselves scored will leave. Keep quality reviews in their own process and use the oversight view only for planning.
No. Most agencies keep their current system for job records and use the oversight view for the cross-project picture. We confirm what your system can share and build the view around the questions your director asks each week.
Rates stay in the accounting or rate system. The oversight app can show whether a linguist is available without showing what that linguist is paid, so rate details never leave their own system.
Count missed client deadlines, rush jobs placed without a qualified linguist and the time between a risk being flagged and a decision being made. Compare those figures with the same months before launch.
The starting point is a mobile build at $4,500. Language pairs, integrations and reporting decide where the final figure lands, and it is set out in writing after the free scoping call.
Contact SIZ Group at +1 254 323 2698 or info@sizgroup.com for a free scoping call. You will receive the scope and price in writing, not as a verbal estimate.