Cohort calendar
Start dates, seat counts, rooms and instructors for every intake, with conflicts flagged before a student sees them.
A coding camp management app gives the general manager one place to see every cohort, instructor assignment and open issue before a start date slips. SIZ Group designs and builds it as a custom mobile app with an admin dashboard for the office.
A coding camp can have three cohorts in flight at once, each with its own start date, lab rota and capstone deadline. The general manager is usually the person who notices when a teaching assistant is booked for two labs on the same evening, or when a student has missed three pre-work submissions in a row. Those signals sit in the enrollment system, the learning platform and a stack of spreadsheets, and nobody sees them together until a cohort is already behind.
A generic business dashboard does not know that a Saturday lab needs a second instructor, that a deposit refund has a fixed policy window, or that a placement report has to match what was promised to a workforce funder. A manager oversight app is built around those camp records. That is why it pays back faster than a general tool, which would need heavy customization to reach the same place.
Before a general manager approves any build, they want proof that the app answers the questions they ask every Monday. Which cohorts start in the next thirty days, and are they fully staffed? Which instructors are close to their contracted weekly hours? Which applicants have paid a deposit but are not yet on a start list? Those answers should appear on one screen, not in an email to the operations coordinator.
We would walk the general manager through a clickable prototype built from their own cohort calendar before writing production code. If the prototype cannot show a missing instructor, a late-work queue and a refund deadline clearly, we change it. Scope and price are set in writing before any build starts, so the sign-off rests on a working screen rather than a slide deck.
The first release should cover the work that loses money or goodwill when it slips. That means the cohort calendar with instructor and room assignments, a queue for late or missing assignments pulled from the learning platform, and a refund tracker that shows each request against its deadline. Those three views usually settle the Monday meeting on their own.
Later phases can add what is useful but not urgent, such as advanced analytics, a custom report for each funder and automated alerts for every quiz score. We would also suggest holding off on moving years of archived cohort records until the new screens prove reliable. Older records can stay in the current system behind a read-only link from the app.
Start dates, seat counts, rooms and instructors for every intake, with conflicts flagged before a student sees them.
Weekly hours and lab coverage for each instructor and teaching assistant, checked against the limits in their contracts.
Missing and late submissions pulled from the learning platform, sorted by cohort and by the attendance or grade threshold in your policy.
Each request with its policy deadline, amount paid and status, so no refund passes its window unnoticed.
Placement and completion figures laid out the way a workforce funder asks for them, built from records the office already keeps.
Instructors, admissions staff and the general manager each see the views their job needs and nothing beyond that.
The most common mistake is asking the app to replace the learning platform. Canvas, Google Classroom and GitHub Classroom already hold submissions and grades, and copying that data into a manager tool creates two versions of the truth. We read what the manager needs through the systems the camp already uses and leave grading where instructors expect it.
The second mistake is designing only for the manager. Teaching assistants will skip an app that adds steps to their evening, so the oversight views should draw from the schedule instructors already update. We would test the dashboard with one instructor and one admissions coordinator before asking anyone to approve it.
A manager oversight app only works if the people it reports on keep their information current. We would start with one cohort, run the dashboard beside the existing calendar for a short overlap, and log every question staff ask during that period. Those questions show which fields are missing and which labels confuse people.
Training should be short and tied to real tasks, such as swapping a teaching assistant, logging a deferral or flagging a student who needs support. A single named owner in the office keeps the calendar accurate after launch, and we document the routine steps so that owner is never guessing.
Measure the app against the numbers the general manager already reports upward. Useful measures include the share of cohorts that start with a full instructor roster, the average time to clear a late-work flag and the share of refund requests answered before their deadline. Compare two or three intakes before and after launch so the result reflects real start dates rather than one good month.
Watch the office inbox as well. If the same staffing and refund questions still arrive by email, the dashboard is missing a view, and that gap is worth closing early. The scoping call is where we agree on the baseline figures and the owner who will report on them, so measurement starts on the first day.
In most cases, yes. We first check what each system exposes, whether that is an API, a scheduled export or a shared report, and build the connection the camp's vendors allow. If nothing automatic is possible, the app can take a daily file upload, which needs a little manual work but removes most of the copying.
No. Grading stays in Canvas, Google Classroom or GitHub Classroom, depending on what the camp runs. The app only reads submission status and flags, so instructors keep entering the grades they already enter and nothing extra.
Mobile app projects start at $4,500, and the final price follows the screens, integrations and user roles agreed in writing. The free scoping call is where we size the first release, so the figure reflects your cohort calendar rather than a guess. Post-launch support is available afterward.
The general manager should name one operations owner who keeps the cohort calendar and instructor assignments current. We train that person, document the routine tasks and fix anything the owner cannot resolve through the admin screens. Larger changes go through a short written change note.
Bring a list of current and upcoming cohorts, each instructor's contracted weekly hours and the refund policy in writing. A few real exported reports from the current system help us see the data as it actually looks. Nothing confidential needs to be shared before the scoping call.
Book a free scoping call with SIZ Group in Austin. We will review your cohort calendar, agree on the first release and confirm scope and price in writing.